OOPSpam vs WebDecoy

OOPSpam spam filtering API vs WebDecoy bot detection. Content analysis vs multi-signal detection—which you need depends on your threat.

OOPSpam vs WebDecoy

OOPSpam and WebDecoy answer different questions. OOPSpam: “Is this content spam?” WebDecoy: “Is this a bot?” Understanding this helps you choose the right tool—or use both.

What Each Does

OOPSpam: Content Spam Filtering API

Content Submitted
    ↓
OOPSpam API
    ├── Content scoring
    ├── Language analysis
    ├── Link analysis
    └── Pattern matching
    ↓
Spam Score (0-6)
    ↓
Allow / Spam

Primary function: Score content quality to identify spam.

Question answered: “Is this content spam?”

WebDecoy: Multi-Signal Bot Detection

User Request
    ↓
WebDecoy Detection Stack
    ├── TLS Fingerprinting (JA3/JA4)
    │   └── Automation signature detection
    ├── IP Enrichment
    │   └── AbuseIPDB + GreyNoise + IPQualityScore
    ├── Geographic Consistency
    ├── Honeypot Detection
    │   ├── Decoy Links
    │   └── Endpoint Decoys
    ├── Behavioral Analysis
    └── Vision AI Detection (FCaptcha)
    ↓
Threat Score (0-100)
    ↓
Allow / Challenge / Block

Primary function: Detect bots through multiple signals.

Question answered: “Is this a bot?”

Key Difference

The fundamental distinction:

Key insight: OOPSpam catches spam content regardless of source. WebDecoy catches bots regardless of content.

Detection Comparison

Why WebDecoy Catches Bots Better

OOPSpam analyzes what was submitted. WebDecoy analyzes who submitted it:

// WebDecoy catches bot BEFORE submission
{
  "signals": {
    "tls": {
      "claimed": "Chrome/121",
      "actual": "Playwright",
      "mismatch": true,
      "score": +45
    },
    "honeypot": {
      "hidden_field": true,
      "score": +50
    },
    "behavioral": {
      "form_time": 150,  // 150ms (too fast)
      "score": +25
    }
  },
  "threat_score": 95,
  "verdict": "block"
}
// Bot blocked regardless of content quality

A bot submitting perfect English with no spam indicators still gets caught by TLS fingerprinting and honeypots.

Pricing

OOPSpam

• ~$23-259/month depending on API calls
• Usage-based pricing

WebDecoy

When to Use Each

OOPSpam Only If:

• Spam content is your only problem
• You need to filter human-generated spam
• Bots aren’t a concern

WebDecoy Only If:

• Bots are your primary problem
• You face scrapers, credential stuffing, or automation
• Content quality isn’t the issue
• You need vision AI detection

Both Together

For comprehensive protection:

• WebDecoy: Block bots before they submit
• OOPSpam: Filter spam from humans that gets through

This catches:

• Bot spam (WebDecoy blocks before submission)
• Human spam (OOPSpam filters content)
• Scrapers (WebDecoy detects)
• AI agents (WebDecoy’s FCaptcha detects)

What WebDecoy Provides

1. Multi-Signal Detection - TLS + IP + Geo + Behavioral + Honeypots
2. Vision AI Detection - FCaptcha catches GPT-4V, Claude Computer Use
3. Honeypots - Decoy Links and Endpoint Decoys
4. TLS Fingerprinting - JA3/JA4 with User-Agent mismatch
5. IP Enrichment - AbuseIPDB, GreyNoise, IPQualityScore
6. AI Crawler Detection - 15+ known AI crawlers
7. SIEM Integration - Splunk, Elastic, CrowdStrike

Get Started

Need bot detection? Start a WebDecoy trial if your problem is automation, not just spam content.

Questions? Contact us to discuss your protection strategy.