Research methodology and corrections

Sources

Product comparisons prioritize current vendor documentation, product pages, standards, and original research. Vendor capabilities are attributed and linked where they affect a buying decision. We avoid repeating pricing, performance, network-size, or accuracy claims that cannot be confirmed from a current primary source.

Testing and examples

Product behavior is checked against shipped WebDecoy code, documentation, or a reproducible product workflow. Illustrative payloads are labeled as examples; they are not presented as production telemetry. A named reviewer appears only when that person actually performed a review.

Dates and material updates

Published dates identify first publication. Updated dates change only after a material revision to claims, methodology, findings, or instructions—not for spelling or formatting edits. Comparisons state the date on which vendor sources were checked because products change after publication.

Limits and conflicts

WebDecoy publishes comparisons involving its own product, so it is not a neutral testing lab. We separate verified vendor facts from our analysis, do not claim access to competitors' private configurations, and state when a conclusion is based on public documentation rather than a controlled head-to-head deployment. Results can vary by traffic mix, configuration, plan, and product release.

Corrections

Send a correction with the page URL and supporting source through the contact page. We investigate reproducible errors, make material corrections in the article, and update its modification date. Questions about implementation belong in the documentation Opens in a new tab .